In a recent article by André Daniels in Polity ZA, it was reported that the South African Revenue Service (SARS) has escalated its efforts to enforce tax compliance. Specifically, SARS is issuing criminal summons against directors of companies who have failed to submit their tax returns. This initiative is part of SARS’ broader strategy to ensure that all corporate entities, along with their directors, fulfill their tax obligations.
The recent surge in summonses represents a notable change in SARS’ approach. Traditionally, the agency has used administrative penalties and audits to promote compliance. However, this fresh enforcement strategy seeks to hold individuals vicariously responsible for their companies’ financial management. Directors, as fiduciaries, are obligated to ensure compliance with tax laws.
According to South African law, failing to submit corporate income tax returns, payroll tax returns, and VAT returns is considered a criminal offense for company directors. The Tax Administration Act stipulates that directors who do not ensure timely submission of their companies’ returns may face severe penalties, including fines and, in certain cases, imprisonment.
When SARS issues criminal summonses, it marks the initiation of legal proceedings that may result in prosecution. If directors are found guilty, they could face imprisonment of up to two years for each successful conviction related to non-compliance.
Several high-profile cases have surfaced, involving directors of prominent companies who have been summoned to court. These incidents have attracted significant media coverage and ignited conversations about corporate governance and accountability. Notably, some business leaders have expressed apprehensions regarding potential overreach and its implications for business operations.
SARS’ issuance of criminal summonses is part of a comprehensive effort to enhance tax compliance in South Africa. The agency has bolstered its data analytics capabilities to more effectively identify non-compliant taxpayers. Additionally, SARS has allocated additional resources to its audit and investigation teams. In this compliance landscape, it is crucial for taxpayers to be fully informed about their legal rights and to seek legal representation, which also affords the protection of legal professional privilege.
In situations where taxpayers find themselves in potentially precarious circumstances, seeking the assistance of a tax professional is the best course of action. Experienced tax practitioners and tax attorneys can help navigate the complexities of tax legislation and optimise compliance, potentially preventing prosecution and asset loss. Dealing with a SARS tax audit or dispute can be stressful, time-consuming and very expensive. It is wise for taxpayers to consider purchasing tax risk insurance to protect themselves against the risk of SARS tax audits and related disputes. Speak to your broker now, before you get that unexpected call from the taxman.
This article has been reproduced by courtesy of TAXRISK UNDERWRITING MANAGERS.
Please note that any information in our posts, documents, infographics, emails etc is general information and should not be considered as providing financial advice. We therefore disclaim all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on such information by any reader, client or visitor to our website. Though we make every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided we accept no liability for any inaccuracies.